I just bought an R5 and I'm freaking out a bit because my flight to Iceland is in literally two weeks and I still havent decided on a walk-around lens. I have about $2600 left to spend and I'm stuck between the RF 24-105mm f/4L and the RF 24-70mm f/2.8L.
The 24-105 is obviously cheaper and has more range which sounds great for hiking but part of me thinks if I'm spending this much on a body I should go for the f2.8. But then the weight might kill me on long trails... I need something that can handle everything from wide landscapes to street shots. Which one should I grab?
Iceland is gonna be incredible but gear weight is no joke when you're trekking through wind and rain. If you're hiking a lot, you might want to consider going with the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM. I know the f/2.8 allure is real, but the extra reach at the long end is a lifesaver for picking out details in distant landscapes. Plus, that weight difference really adds up over a 10-mile day. Be careful about thinking you absolutely need the speed of the Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM for scenery. Since you have the R5, the IBIS is so good that you can usually handhold the f/4 lens in dim light anyway. I would suggest the 24-105 for the versatility. Make sure to grab some extra batteries too, the cold eats them up. You're gonna have a blast!
