So I finally booked my trip to Zion for next month and I am beyond stoked to get some massive shots of the canyons. Ive been shooting on my 90D for a few years now mostly doing wildlife with my 100-400 but now I actually need something wide and Im stuck.
My logic was to grab the Canon 10-18mm since its so light but then I started worrying that the 32.5mp sensor is gonna just outresolve that cheap glass. Is the 10-22mm worth the extra cash or should I just go third party like the Tokina 11-16mm? I have about $550 saved up and really need something that wont go soft at the edges when I stop down for those deep valley views...
Building on the earlier suggestion, Im satisfied sticking with Canon:
- Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM: Sturdier and very reliable.
- Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM: Good value but feels kinda cheap.
In my experience, the 32.5mp sensor on the 90D definitely outresolves the cheaper 10-18mm glass. I've tried many wide-angle lenses over the years and recommend the Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM for better corner sharpness. If you want speed, the Tokina atx-i 11-16mm f/2.8 CF is an excellent alternative. It stays sharp when stopped down and fits your $550 budget perfectly... dont settle for the cheaper glass.
^ This. Also, be careful about flare in those canyons. I struggled with ghosting until I tried the Tamron 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD there.
- Stop down to f/8
- Use a hood
Great info, saved!
