Ugh, Im losing my mind trying to pick a lens for my R6. Im heading to Japan in three weeks and need one solid walkaround lens for street photography and maybe some architecture. I looked at the RF 24-105mm f/4, and everyone says its the standard, but then I read a bunch of forums claiming its too soft or boring compared to the 24-70mm f/2.8. But the 24-70 is like twice the price and heavy as a brick, and my budget is strictly under 1500 bucks. I dont want to carry a whole bag of primes but I also dont want blurry shots. Is the f/4 actually enough for night stuff in Tokyo or am I gonna regret not splurging?
Honestly, skip the expensive f/2.8 if you're traveling. I've used the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM for years and it is plenty sharp for street work. In Tokyo, you're better off with the extra reach and weight savings.
- Pack a cheap Canon RF 50mm f/1.8 STM for the night stuff
- The stabilization on the f/4 is solid Don't stress, just save your cash for the sushi.
Honestly, grab the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM. It is super light and cheap. Use the extra cash for:
- Canon RF 50mm f/1.8 STM for nights
- Good food in Tokyo
Late to the party, but honestly, don't overthink it! When I went to Japan, I was stressed about the exact same thing. I lugged around a huge, heavy lens thinking I needed the best glass possible, and I ended up hating the weight after just two days of walking around Shibuya. Youre gonna be walking like 20k steps a day, so keeping your setup light is actually the biggest factor for quality shots because you wont be too tired to take them! I eventually switched to a more modest variable aperture zoom and barely noticed a difference in my photos. The f/4 is totally fine for night stuff since the R6 handles high ISO like a champ anyway. Just enjoy the trip and eat all the ramen!
