im torn between the 18-140mm and the 12-28mm for my Zfc. Heading to Japan in two weeks and need to stay light.
- Budget: $600 max
- Use case: street and temple shots
the 18-140 is versatile but is it too big for all day walking? Or should I go wide...
Re: "I had issues with the Nikon Z DX..."
- Totally agree! Grab the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24mm f/1.7 DX because its fantastic in dim temples and weighs almost nothing. Youll love the results!
@Reply #2 - good point! If youre trying to save money for the actual trip, these are the most cost-effective choices I have used:
- Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR is incredibly light and easy to find used.
- Viltrox 23mm f/1.4 AF Z-Mount provides a fast aperture for dim temples at a lower price point. Both options balance weight and cost effectively for your Japan trip.
I had issues with the Nikon Z DX 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR when I was in Kyoto. It felt bulky after hiking all day and that f/6.3 aperture at the long end is honestly disappointing for dim temples. Missing shots because of slow glass was frustrating. The Nikon Z DX 12-28mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ VR is better for tight streets, but unfortunately the power zoom feels laggy compared to a mechanical ring.
Same here!
