So I finally pulled the trigger on a used Z6 body last week and I am freaking out because my flight to Kyoto is in exactly nine days and I still dont have a proper lens for it. I have been adapting my old F-mount glass with the FTZ but the autofocus is just too slow for travel and I dont want to carry that bulky adapter everywhere honestly. I need something that can just stay on the camera 90% of the time because my bag space is super limited since I am only doing carry-on for this whole three week trip.

I am currently stuck between two main choices and I cant make up my mind for the life of me.

• The Z 24-70mm f/4 S: I can find this super cheap used right now, like under $400, which would leave me plenty of cash for food and activities while I am out there. It is small and light which is a huge plus for my back.
• The Z 24-120mm f/4 S: Everyone says this is the ultimate travel lens but it costs way more, like over a thousand bucks, and it is definitely heavier and longer. Is that extra reach worth the extra weight when I am walking 20k steps a day through temples?

I was also looking at the 28-75mm f/2.8 because I love the idea of that low light capability for the night markets but I have heard mixed things about the sharpness compared to the S-line glass. I am mostly shooting street scenes, some landscapes, and definitely some close up food shots. If I go with the 24-70 I might have room in my budget for a tiny prime like the 40mm f/2 but I really dont want to be swapping lenses in the rain or crowded subways if I can avoid it.

What do you guys think is the move here? I need to order something by tomorrow night to make sure it gets to my house in Seattle before I head to the airport. Is the 24-120 really that much better for a one-lens setup or should I just save the money and go with the kit 24-70? I am so torn and the clock is ticking...