Ive been shooting with my R6 for about two years now and honestly, I thought I had my kit dialed in, but my current setup just isnt cutting it for the portrait work I have lined up next month. I usually stick to my 24-70mm for versatility but the bokeh just feels a bit flat and clinical lately. I really need something with more character for a series of outdoor couple shoots I have booked in Seattle, and the weather is probably gonna be gray and gloomy as usual, so I need that extra light gathering.
Im feeling super frustrated trying to decide between native RF glass and adapting my old EF primes. Here is what I am looking at:
- Budget is around 1500 to 2000 bucks, maybe a tiny bit more if its worth it.
- Needs to have really smooth subject separation, I am so over that harsh digital look.
- Fast autofocus is a must because these clients move around a ton.
Should I just bite the bullet and go for the RF 85mm f/1.2 even if I have to eat ramen for a month, or is the 85mm f/2 actually decent enough for professional work? Maybe the Sigma Art lenses are still the move? I dont know, my head is spinning with these reviews...
Honestly, skip the ramen diet. The RF 85mm f/1.2 is incredible, but in my experience, the weight makes it a nightmare for long outdoor sessions where you're constantly moving with clients. If you want that dreamy character without the massive price tag or back pain, consider these instead:
- Canon RF 85mm f/2 Macro IS STM
- Honestly, for the price, it is a steal. The bokeh is surprisingly soft and the stabilization is a lifesaver on gloomy Seattle days when your shutter speed drops.
- Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art EF
- If you have the adapter, this lens still holds its own. The rendering is less clinical than the newer RF glass and gives that classic look you are chasing. Personally, I'd grab the f/2 and put the leftover cash toward a solid lighting setup or a backup body. You really don't need the f/1.2 to get professional results.
Re: Honestly, skip the ramen diet. The RF 85mm... I gotta disagree with the idea that you need to go for the most expensive native glass to get pro results. Over the years, I have tried many setups, and in my experience, the RF 85mm f/2 is honestly more than enough for professional work. Unless you are shooting for high-end magazines, clients wont notice the difference in bokeh, but your wallet sure will. Save that extra cash for something else you might need in the field. Maybe pick up a solid filter or just save for a rainy day. Seriously, look at these instead:
- Canon RF 85mm f/2 Macro IS STM for that sweet balance of price and sharpness
- Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art EF-Mount if you have an adapter lying around Dont stress too much about the gear, your eye matters more than the aperture anyway.
Honestly, the f/1.2 glass is magical but that weight is no joke for long sessions. I used to lug around heavy glass for years and my back definitely felt it. Before you commit to selling a kidney, what is the focal length you find yourself gravitating toward most when you shoot couples? Are you looking for that super tight headshot compression or more environmental stuff?