Forum

What is the best ge...
 
Notifications
Clear all

What is the best general purpose zoom for L-mount cameras?

2 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
120 Views
0
Topic starter

Im getting kinda stressed because I have a trip to Japan coming up in just three weeks and I still dont have a solid general purpose lens for my Lumix S5ii. I was using a prime for a while but I think I really need the versatility of a zoom since I wont have time to swap glass while wandering around Tokyo or hiking near Fuji.

So I was looking at the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art, and honestly it looks amazing, but then I read a bunch of threads saying the Lumix 24-105mm f/4 is actually way better for travel because of that extra reach and the stabilization. My logic was that f/2.8 is non-negotiable for low light but now im second guessing everything. Is 105mm worth giving up the bokeh of the 2.8? I also looked at the Lumix 20-60mm kit lens because it was super cheap and honestly it fits my budget way better since I also need to pay for flights, but is it too soft for a primary travel lens?

Im kind of just going in circles here. I keep looking at comparison charts but they just show sharpness scores and dont really explain what it feels like to carry these things all day. Does anyone here actually use these for travel? I really dont want to be in the middle of a shoot and realize I made a huge mistake with my gear choice. Im just stuck on whether to save the cash and go with the 20-60 or if im gonna regret not getting the 24-70 or 24-105 later... anyone have any advice or experience with these lenses?


12

Coming back to this, I think I can offer a different perspective. I was in your shoes last year before a big trip and felt totally overwhelmed by the cost. I ended up grabbing a used Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8 DG DN Contemporary instead of the bigger Art lenses. It saved me a ton of cash for actual experiences in Japan.

  • The weight difference is massive. It honestly feels like a toy compared to the heavy glass.
  • You lose a little on the wide end, but it stays pretty sharp for a budget pick.
  • I never felt like I was missing out on shots, and it didn't hurt my neck after ten hours of walking. If you are worried about the price, don't feel forced to buy the top-tier gear. You will have a better time if you aren't stressing about your wallet.


10

Honestly, skip the stress. I have taken the Panasonic Lumix S 20-60mm f/3.5-5.6 all over the place and it is way better than people give it credit for. Sure, it is not an f/2.8, but for travel, that wide 20mm end is a game changer in tight Japanese alleyways or temples where you just cannot back up any further. Save that extra cash for your flights and food. You really dont need the weight of the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art hanging off your neck for ten hours a day. In my experience, you'll regret the bulk long before you regret the slightly slower aperture. Just pack a cheap little prime if you are really worried about low light, but for 90% of your shots, the kit lens is totally fine.


3

Look, I have been shooting L-mount since the S1 came out, and honestly, the choice comes down to what you prioritize more: pure glass quality or convenience. If you are really worried about low light in Tokyo, grab the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art. It is sharper than almost anything else, and that f/2.8 aperture is a lifesaver when you are doing street photography at night. Carrying that lens all day is definitely noticeable, but the image quality makes it worth it. If you prefer range, the Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 MACRO O.I.S. is basically the king of travel versatility. I have used it on countless trips and that extra 35mm on the long end is a huge deal when you cant physically get closer to your subject, especially at temples or while hiking. Plus, the stabilization is genuinely solid if you are doing any video work handheld. Here is how I see it:

  • The Sigma is for when you want professional-level bokeh and speed.
  • The Lumix 24-105 is the ultimate one-lens solution for day-long exploration. If budget is tight, dont stress about the 20-60 being soft. It is actually quite sharp in the center. But if you want a lens that will last you years and keep you from wanting an upgrade immediately, just bite the bullet on one of the others. You really wont regret having the extra build quality once you are actually on the ground.


Share:
Affiliate Disclosure: Some of the links in this article are affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This means if you click on the link and purchase the item, we may receive a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site and allows us to continue making comprehensive reviews.