What is the actual best all-around lens for a Sony full-frame body right now? Ive been shooting with the A7iii for like four years now and honestly, I am getting so tired of swapping primes in the middle of a shoot. I usually carry a 35mm and an 85mm but it is just becoming a massive pain when Im out doing street stuff or just trying to capture my nieces running around at the park.
My budget is around 1200 bucks, maybe a little more if I can find a deal used. I know the 24-70mm G Master is the gold standard but that thing is heavy and costs a fortune. Ive been eyeballing the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II, but I keep reading mixed things about the zoom creep and the weight balance. Is it actually worth the upgrade or am I better off just sticking with my primes and dealing with the hassle? I just want one lens I can leave on the camera for 90 percent of what I do without feeling like I am carrying a brick or getting soft corners. Any thoughts from anyone who has made the switch to a zoom recently?
Regarding what #1 said about sticking with the Sigma, it is solid advice but dont overlook the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 Di III VXD G2 if you want to save weight. People keep debating between the Sigma and the Tamron, but honestly both beat hauling a bag of primes.
- Check local listings for used gear to stay under budget
- Keep a cleaning kit handy since zooms suck in dust Really just pick one and stop overthinking it. You will enjoy shooting way more.
Honestly, I get your frustration. I spent way too much time swapping glass until I finally caved and bought the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 Di III VXD G2. It is nowhere near as expensive as the G Master, and tbh, it handles way better for long park days with the kids because of the weight. I had issues with my old Sigma feeling like an anchor around my neck, and this Tamron feels way more balanced on the A7iii. ^ This. Also, if you really want that extra bit of width for street shots, you might feel the 28mm is a bit tight compared to your 24mm primes, but the trade-off in price and bulk is just worth it imo. I found mine used for a steal, like under 800 bucks, which leaves you plenty of extra cash for some decent filters or a spare battery. The sharpness is totally fine for 90 percent of what you're doing, and honestly, nobody is gonna notice the corner softness on a park photo of your nieces anyway. I really wanted to love the heavier lenses, but unfortunately, the constant weight just made me leave my camera at home more often. Save yourself the headache and the cash, grab the Tamron, and just enjoy shooting again without the gear anxiety.
Honestly, sticking with the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art is your best bet for a one-lens setup. It is significantly lighter than the GM version and sharper in the corners too. Just keep these things in mind:
- The focus breathing is minimal but check your firmware.
- Watch the zoom ring tension over time. It is definitely worth the jump from swapping lenses, just be careful with the front element when walking around.