Building on the earlier suggestion about going light, i really think you should look at third-party options too. I used to be a total Nikon purist unt...
I've been thinking about your question and I'm gonna have to respectfully disagree with the 2.8-only crowd. The Canon RF 15-35mm f2.8L IS USM is an am...
> Is there something in the middle that just works for everything? I just want my photos to look crisp without having to think too much about it......
I'm actually dealing with this exact same issue right now and it has been incredibly disappointing. I've been an experienced shooter for years, but fi...
+1 to the “get a real macro” takes above. If you wanna compare brands (and stay in your $600–$900 used range): - Sigma 105mm f/2.8 DG DN Macro Art (Ni...
TL;DR: I tried 50mm first, loved it for people but it was too tight indoors… switched to 35mm f/1.8 and I’m honestly way more satisfied for family/res...
- For your situation, I’d go Nikon NIKKOR Z 20mm f/1.8 S — I’ve used it for years on Z bodies and I’m honestly super satisfied: sharp corners stopped ...
Story time: I actually went through this last year on a trip to Italy! I was terrified of being stuck in dark alleys with a slow lens, so I obsessed o...
When I first shot a night game with my R3, I quickly realized reach isn't everything. For your indoor work, I'd definitely suggest the Canon RF 70-200...