^ This. Also, I really feel the struggle. I went through the same thing last year in Spain and it was honestly such a letdown. I thought the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/4 S would be the ultimate companion for my Nikon Z6 III but I had so many issues with it.

• the constant zooming in and out just to realize 70mm isn't enough for street portraits
• missing shots because the lens was retracted and I couldn't get it ready fast enough
• the f/4 aperture being basically useless for those moody late-night shots in the city It's just disappointing when you realize your perfect kit is actually getting in the way of the experience. I spent half my time in Madrid just wishing I had something different. Its just super frustrating because you want to travel light but then you miss the shot you actually wanted. Unfortunately the compact dream always seems to come with these annoying trade-offs...

Honestly, the biggest mistake people make is overpacking glass! You're gonna be walking miles in Europe, so keep it light. I've seen so many photographers drop thousands on heavy f/2.8 zooms they end up leaving in the hotel room because they're just too bulky. It's a total waste of cash if you ask me. I love a lightweight kit, it makes the whole experience so much more fun!

• Stay away from the heavy pro 'trinity' zooms for backpacking; they're total overkill.
• Dont ignore the slower f/4 zooms. They're amazing for travel, super sharp, and way easier on the budget.
• Avoid bringing a lens for every single possible scenario. Youll spend more time swapping glass than actually seeing the sights. Stick to one versatile zoom and maybe one tiny prime for night shots. Youll save a ton of money and actually enjoy the trip more without a sore neck! Just keep it simple and focus on the amazing views.

Like someone mentioned, sticking to f/4 zooms is the smart play. The NIKKOR Z 24-120mm f/4 S is basically the gold standard for travel on the Z6 III. It covers everything from wide landscapes to tighter shots. It's slightly heavier than the 24-70 but the extra reach is worth it when you're shooting architecture or street scenes from across the road. Looking at other brands, the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 G2 for Nikon Z is a decent option if you really need that f/2.8 aperture for low light. It's lighter than the Nikon S-line f/2.8 zooms, but you'll miss the 24mm wide end for landscapes and narrow city streets. Nikon's glass generally has better weather sealing too, which matters if you're out in the elements. I'd go with the Nikon 24-120 and add the NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2. The 40mm is tiny enough to keep in a pocket and it's perfect for night walks when you want a lighter setup. It covers almost every scenario you'll hit without being too bulky to carry all day.

Huh interesting. I had no idea. The more you know I guess 🤷

For me it's Z 14-30 f4 + Z 24-120 combo.

I really have to agree with the points made about the f/4 zoom approach. After using my camera for quite some time now, I am incredibly satisfied with how the native glass performs. It has been a very methodical way to build a kit without breaking the bank or my back during long walks. A few reasons this setup works well for me:

• Excellent balance on the camera body during travel
• Consistent weather sealing across the different lenses
• No need for extra adapters which keeps everything compact If you are looking for reliability, just go with Nikon. You honestly cannot go wrong with their native lenses. I have found that staying within their ecosystem provides the most seamless experience for street and landscape photography without any technical headaches. It honestly works well and I have no complaints.

Saving this whole thread. So much good info here you guys are awesome.

Get the new nikkor z 28-400mm f/4-8 vr

Bump - same question here

Finally someone says it. Ive been thinking this for a while but wasnt sure.