Hey everyone! I recently upgraded to a Sony full-frame body and I’m looking to invest in some high-quality glass specifically for landscape photography. I’ve been eyeing the 16-35mm range for versatility, but I’m also considering a fast prime like a 20mm for those sharper corner-to-corner shots. Since I hike quite a bit to get to my locations, I’m trying to balance image quality with weight and filter compatibility—standard 82mm threads are a huge plus. I’m a bit overwhelmed by the choices between the Sony GM series and third-party options like Sigma or Tamron. Between zooms and primes, what do you consider the absolute best lens for capturing vast landscapes on a Sony system?
Yo! I've been shooting for years and honestly, the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II is the best choice if you need that 82mm thread!! It's way more versatile than the Sony FE 20mm F1.8 G, which is amazing but uses 67mm filters I think? The zoom is basically a bit heavier tho. Tbh for vast landscapes, that GM II is the absolute winner! gl!
Quick question - before I give advice, what's your actual budget range?? Weight is EVERYTHING when hiking, right? The Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM II is legendary but runs like $2,300... kinda steep! If you want a steal, the Sigma 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN Contemporary for Sony E is basically $900 and SO light. Are you trying to stay under $1k or go all out??
Honestly for hiking you really gotta focus on the build quality and weather sealing since youre exposed to the elements. Most pros look for a few specific things when it comes to reliability:
- internal zoom designs so dust doesnt get sucked in
- metal mounts with rubber gaskets
- fluorine coatings to shed rain drops It kinda reminds me of this one trip to the coast last winter where the fog was so thick I couldnt even see my own tripod legs. I ended up spending most of the time trying to keep my sandwiches dry because my backpack zipper decided to jam right when the rain started. I was so annoyed about that bag... I bought it specifically because it was supposed to be waterproof but the salt air just wrecked the metal teeth on the zip. Spent like forty mins fighting with it while the light was actually getting good. Anyway lol sorry kinda went off topic there.
Finally someone says it. Ive been thinking this for a while but wasnt sure.
Following this thread
To add to the point above: honestly its ridiculous how much these companies expect us to shell out lately for decent glass. Weve touched on the high-end Sony options and the more affordable Sigma zooms, but the reality is that the industry is just squeezing enthusiasts at this point. It drives me crazy that everything is becoming so over-engineered that you cant even do basic maintenance yourself. Back in the day, if you got a bit of grit in the barrel while out hiking, you could usually strip it down and clean it. Now, with all the complex linear motors and proprietary seals mentioned in this thread, youre basically stuck with a paperweight unless you pay a massive repair fee. Its such a scam that were forced to choose between heavy, overpriced pro gear or lighter builds that feel like theyll fall apart after a year of heavy use. Companies just dont prioritize long-term durability for the actual user anymore, they just want everyone on a perpetual upgrade cycle.
