I went through this exact dilemma when I picked up my L-mount kit last year. Honestly, I ended up getting the Sigma 85mm F1.4 DG DN Art and I have no ...
Just saw this thread and wanted to share my experience since I started with a T7 too. I have been super satisfied with how both these lenses perform. ...
Saw this thread and had to chime in because i've been in your shoes before. Honestly, if you are on a strict $900 budget, just grab a used Nikon NIKKO...
Adding my two cents... Ive tried many budget setups over the years and found that for big landscapes, autofocus is kinda overrated. I used a TTArtisan...
The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM is what I use and honestly I am very happy with the results. It fits your budget easily and works well for almost...
To add to the point above: I have to disagree with the 24-105mm suggestion. The f4 aperture is unfortunately just not as good as expected for isolatin...
Ok sooo been there — I went down the “which Fuji lens melts backgrounds the nicest” rabbit hole last year, and I ended up spending way too much time l...
Yep, this is the way
For your situation, I’d grab the NIKKOR Z 14-30mm f/4 S—hits the $800–$1,200 range, lightweight for hikes, sharp corners at f/8, and 82mm screw-in fil...
Been using this for years, no complaints
Been using this for years, no complaints
For your situation, on the S5 II, the lenses that feel the most “snappy” to me are the newer linear-motor stuff. - Panasonic Lumix S PRO 24-70mm F2.8...
Been using this for years, no complaints
> I mainly do run-and-gun event work. Do you guys prefer native RF lenses for the autofocus, or is adapted glass the way to go? Curious about one thi...