Just picked up an EOS R10 and im absolutely loving it but the kit lens definitely isnt wide enough for the mountain views during my hiking trips. I really need to grab something before heading out to the PNW early next month. Im torn between the RF-S 10-18mm because it looks super portable and the Rokinon 12mm prime because its way cheaper. My budget is pretty tight around 350-400 dollars max. Is the autofocus and versatility of the 10-18 actually worth the extra cost over a manual prime or am I better off just saving my money and going with the cheaper option
I honestly think you're overthinking the autofocus part for landscapes. When I was hiking in the Smokies last fall with my Rokinon 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS Manual Focus Lens, I was actually really happy with how it performed. You usually just set it to infinity and everything turns out sharp. Youll save a nice chunk of change for trip gear. It feels super solid and the image quality is crisp tbh.
Honestly, just grab the Canon RF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM. I know its a bit more cash than the manual primes, but honestly having autofocus for hiking is a total game changer. Trying to dial in focus on a Rokinon while the light is changing or your hands are freezing up in the PNW is just a headache you dont need. Plus, the stabilization works well for handheld shots when you dont want to lug a tripod around. Its super compact so it wont weigh your bag down on those long trails. I honestly think the convenience and the zoom range make it worth skipping a few takeout meals to cover the cost. You wont regret it, trust me. Just keep an eye out for refurbished deals if you want to save a few bucks!
@Reply #2 - good point! If you want a solid wider alternative, look for a used Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM plus a Canon Mount Adapter EF-EOS R. You get autofocus, image stabilization, and a super wide field of view for well under 400 bucks. It is arguably the best value for money in the Canon ecosystem right now for landscape photographers on a tight budget.