I've been staring at my screen for three hours and I'm honestly just annoyed at how expensive glass is for the R6. I bought the body like six months ago and I've just been using an old adapted nifty fifty but I'm going to Tokyo in three weeks and I need a real do-it-all lens because I don't want to carry a giant bag of primes and honestly I'm just overwhelmed with the options.

I'm stuck between the RF 24-105mm f4L and the RF 24-70mm f2.8. The 24-70 is obviously better for low light but it's freaking huge and like double the price of what I want to spend and I just dont know if I can justify it. I've got a hard limit of $1400 which makes the 2.8 impossible unless I find a miracle used deal. Then there's the cheap non-L 24-105 but I'm worried the image quality won't keep up with the sensor.

Here's what I need:

• stays under 1.5 lbs if possible my neck can't take much more
• good enough for street photography at night
• versatile enough for landscapes and portraits
• must arrive before my flight on the 12th

Is the f4 really gonna be okay for those neon Tokyo streets at night or am I gonna regret not saving up for the 2.8? Or should I just give up and get the 24-240 superzoom even though it feels like a waste on an R6 body? I'm just so torn right now and every review says something different...