Forum

Looking for the bes...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Looking for the best budget macro lens for Canon EOS RP.

7 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
276 Views
0
Topic starter

What is the absolute best macro lens for a Canon RP that wont break the bank because Im seriously about to give up on my current setup? Honestly im so fed up with trying to adapt these old vintage lenses I found at a garage sale because they look like absolute mush on a full frame sensor and the manual focus is making me want to pull my hair out when Im trying to shoot tiny insects that just wont stay still.

I live in a tiny town in Oregon and we dont have any camera shops nearby so I have to order everything online and hope for the best but my budget is strictly under 400 bucks right now. I bought the RP because I wanted to get into more serious flower and bug photography but using these cheap macro tubes and old Nikon glass with a crappy adapter is just ruining the experience for me... I spend more time fighting the gear than actually taking photos and I really need something native or at least something that actually talks to the camera properly before the spring bloom starts here in a couple weeks.

Is there anything even out there for that price that isnt total garbage? I was looking at the RF 35mm but I dont know if the 0.5x magnification is actually enough for what I want and the 85mm is way too expensive for me right now. Maybe a used Sigma or Tamron if I can find a deal? I just want something sharp that wont make me regret buying into the RF system...


7 Answers
12

> I was looking at the RF 35mm ^ This. Also, I disagree on the 35mm for bugs. I'm satisfied with a used Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM, its reliable and fits your budget.


4

Honestly, if you are stuck under 400 bucks, your options are pretty limited and kinda frustrating. I tried going the cheap route with the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM because it has that center macro feature, but unfortunately, it was a massive disappointment. The focus fall-off is so aggressive that unless your subject is dead center, the rest of the image looks like mush. It was not as good as expected, especially for fine details on a flower. I spent way too much time trying to make it work. I even built a custom flash diffuser out of a plastic milk jug and some foam to get more light so I could stop down, but the lens just couldnt keep up. For your budget, you really have to look at the Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM. Its sharp, but the 0.5x magnification is a real letdown for bugs. You have to get so close you will basically hit the insect with your lens. Its annoying how expensive the native RF stuff is for actual 1:1 macro. Maybe look for a used Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM if you can find a deal, even if you hate adapters.


3

Building on the earlier suggestion, I totally have to jump in because I went through this exact same struggle when I started! I spent a whole month trying to photograph dragonflies with a setup that just wasnt right, and man, I was so close to tossing my camera in the lake. It was so amazing when I finally realized what I was doing wrong! While some folks suggest the wider native options, I really think you should be careful. I found a few things that totally ruined my early shots:

  • Working distance is everything. If you go with a shorter focal length like a 35mm, you have to get so close you literally bump into the flower or scare the bug away.
  • Your own lens will cast a shadow on the subject if you're too close, which is honestly the most annoying thing ever when the light is otherwise perfect!
  • Avoid anything that isnt true 1:1 magnification if you really want to see the tiny details on those insects. 0.5x feels like a tease after a while. Seriously, dont settle for something that doesnt give you enough breathing room... its gonna make you want to give up all over again! Just keep an eye out for those specific specs before you hit buy.


3

Jumping in here because I've been shooting with the RP for a while now. Quick question tho, what kind of bugs are we talking about? If you're doing butterflies or bees, you need distance, but if it's tiny spiders or ants, you'll want that 1:1 magnification for sure. Honestly, if you want actual 1:1 macro and autofocus for under $400, your best bet is a used Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM. I know you said you're tired of adapters, but if you get the official Canon Mount Adapter EF-EOS R, it's a totally different world than those cheap manual ones. It talks to the camera perfectly and the AF is reliable. I've used that setup for years and it's way sharper than any vintage glass you'll find. The Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM is a solid lens but like you guessed, 0.5x is gonna feel a bit lacking if you're trying to get really tight shots of small insects.


2

Same here!


2

This is exactly what I needed to hear. Youre a lifesaver honestly.


1

I totally feel your pain with those garage sale lenses! I remember trying to shoot orchard bees with a funky old adapter and it was a total nightmare... everything looked like mud! You can definitely find 1:1 macro options under 400 but you gotta watch out for:

  • magnification ratios (0.5x vs 1:1)
  • minimal working distance
  • AF communication errors Seriously, getting native AF for those 26 megapixels is an amazing game changer tho...


Share: