So I finally pulled the trigger on the R6 Mark II and man this thing is a beast compared to my old 6D. I am so hyped to get out there and use it but I really need a dedicated portrait prime that is gonna give me that creamy bokeh everyone wants for the outdoor senior sessions I have booked for the fall. I have been obsessing over reviews for weeks now and I am totally torn between two main options.
My logic was to go for the RF 85mm f1.2 because it is basically the gold standard right? But then I saw some samples from the RF 135mm f1.8 and that compression is just insane for outdoor stuff. I have about $2600 saved up from my summer gigs so I can technically afford the 85 if I find a good deal but the 135 is cheaper and leaves me room for extra batteries and maybe a new bag which I definitely need.
I am also slightly considering the 85mm f2 just to save a ton of cash but I am worried the autofocus wont keep up with kids or moving subjects during my shoots since I heard it is a bit slower. Is the f1.2 really worth the extra weight and cost over the 135mm for someone shooting mostly in parks and open fields? I usually have plenty of space to back up so the focal length isnt a huge issue but I just cant decide which one will give me that wow factor before my October schedule kicks off...
@Reply #2 - good point! Sticking with L-series glass for the R6 II is smart for pros. Weather sealing is huge for outdoors. About that Canon RF 85mm f2 Macro IS STM, honestly, skip it. Its decent but the AF is sluggish compared to the Canon RF 135mm f1.8L IS USM. Saving cash over the 1.2 lets you grab a Peak Design Everyday Backpack 30L and extra batteries too.
In my experience, the Canon RF 135mm f/1.8L IS USM wins for outdoor work.
- Better compression than Canon RF 85mm f/1.2L USM
- More affordable Definitely grab it, you'll love the look.
I moved to a pro Canon setup and the reliability is amazing! Stick with any professional grade prime from Canon. The weather sealing is fantastic and beats third-party options for safety!