Forum

Best macro lens for...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Best macro lens for Fujifilm X-T5?

13 Posts
14 Users
0 Reactions
425 Views
0
Topic starter

Hey everyone — I just picked up a Fujifilm X-T5 and I’m looking to add a dedicated macro lens, but I’m a bit stuck on which direction to go. My main use would be close-up shots of small subjects (flowers, coins, watch parts, and the occasional bug), so I’d really like true 1:1 magnification if possible. I also shoot handheld a lot, so I’m wondering how important OIS is on the Fuji system, especially with the X-T5’s high-res sensor where tiny shakes seem more obvious.

I’ve been looking at the Fujifilm XF 80mm f/2.8 Macro, the XF 60mm f/2.4, and even adapting something like a Laowa macro, but I’m unsure about the real-world tradeoffs (AF speed, sharpness at 1:1, working distance, and how heavy the 80mm feels on the X-T5). Budget is flexible, but I’d rather not overspend if the difference is minor.

For X-T5 owners specifically: what’s the best macro lens setup you’d recommend for sharp, practical close-up shooting, and why?


12 Answers
8

Ok so for ur use (1:1 + handheld), I’d grab the Fujifilm XF 80mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro used—usually like $650–$900—and call it a day. It’s sharp at 1:1, AF is decent, and OIS + the X-T5’s IBIS seriously helps at high-res. The Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro is cheaper (~$250–$400) but only 1:2 and you’re closer. Laowa is awesome value ($400–$600) if you’re cool with manual focus.


4

For your situation, I’d lean toward the newer, true 1:1 macro option with stabilization if you’re mostly handheld on the X‑T5. The older/smaller macro is fun but you’ll be closer and it’s kinda limiting for bugs.

- OIS/IBIS: honestly pretty important at high res, especially at 1:1
- Working distance: more distance = less scared bugs + easier lighting
- AF: macros hunt a lot, so a focus limiter helps (if the lens has it)

If you’re cool with manual focus, an adapted macro is sharp as heck, but handheld is… yeah, a vibe lol


3

Interested in this too


3

Same boat, watching this


2

- In my experience, for true 1:1 on the X-T5, working distance + stabilization matter WAY more than specs on paper.
- I started with a smaller/older macro and quickly got annoyed: not quite 1:1, had to get super close, and bugs just bailed.
- Then I tried a longer stabilized macro and handheld got реально easier (IBIS helps, but OIS+IBIS is clutch at macro distances).
- AF at 1:1 is always kinda meh, so I mostly use manual + focus peaking and rock in/out. ngl, that made the biggest difference.


2

Commenting to find later


2

Ok adding this to my list of things to try. Thanks for the tip!


2

This thread is gold. Bookmarking for future reference 🔖


2

Noted!


2

Same here!


2

I honestly found the whole process a bit frustrating since the high-res sensor on the X-T5 makes every little flaw stand out so much, unfortunately. I was really hoping for a cheaper way to get into this, but it feels like you're stuck between massive prices or blurry shots. Not sure if this is the best way, but I've heard some people say you can get decent results without a dedicated lens if you're careful. I think these might be worth looking into if you want to save money:

  • Getting some macro extension tubes for your current lenses
  • Using an old manual macro lens with a basic adapter (IIRC some old glass is still pretty solid)
  • Maybe those screw-on close-up filters, though I've heard they might not be sharp enough for that sensor It's a bit of a gamble, but it might save you a few hundred bucks while you figure out if you really need the fancy stuff. I'm still trying to figure it out myself, but hopefully you find a setup that works for you!


1

I've been shooting with my X-T5 for about a year now, and honestly, I'm still learning how to handle that 40mp sensor—it really shows *every* little mistake! One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet is the Fujifilm XF 30mm f/2.8 R LM WR Macro. - If you're doing watches and coins, this lens is basically a sleeper hit. It’s way smaller than the 80mm so it doesn't feel front-heavy on the X-T5 body, and the autofocus is actually pretty snappy for a macro. - Just a heads up though, because it's a wider focal length, you have to get the lens almost touching the subject for 1:1. It’s great for stuff that doesn't move, but maybe a bit tricky for bugs? I’ve also found that with the high res of the X-T5, sometimes I just back up a tiny bit to get more depth of field and then crop in later. Does anyone else feel like 1:1 handheld is almost impossible even with the IBIS, or is it just my shaky hands? haha


1

Honestly, I've had a bit of a disappointing run trying to find a macro lens that doesn't feel clunky on the X-T5. The high resolution makes any focus breathing or AF hunting really obvious, and unfortunately, the native Fuji lenses are either massive or just dont quite hit that sweet spot for me. If you're willing to look at third-party stuff, here are some alternatives:

  • Laowa 65mm f/2.8 2x Ultra Macro APO : This is probably the sharpest option for the price (around $400). It's fully manual tho, which is a letdown if you wanted AF, but for 2:1 magnification, it's incredible.
  • 7Artisans 60mm f/2.8 II Macro : Super affordable at like $160, but the compatibility issues with EXIF data are a pain. My main concern for you would be that these manual lenses wont talk to your camera body. You wont get aperture info in your files, which makes troubleshooting your settings later basically impossible. Its a bit of a trade-off for the lower price, so just be prepared for that. You'll get there though, the sensor is definitely worth the effort!


Share: