Like someone mentioned, stick to the budget if you can. I honestly think the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G is a total steal. If you save that extra...
> it is so hard to tell if the extra zoom reach is worth it. Quick question: are you shooting mostly low-light architecture or just casual street s...
^ This. Also, grab the Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM. It is just fantastic for indoor work and the stabilizer is a total lifesaver for those shaky,...
^ This. Also, honestly, the kit lens issue is just a rite of passage with the R7. It is a fantastic body but those kit lenses are real mood killers fo...
Adding my two cents, you have a solid dilemma. The 24-70 provides that pro-grade aperture, while the 24-105 is basically the king of travel convenienc...
I remember agonizing over sensor readout speeds and rolling shutter before my big trip last year. Honestly I ended up getting an older setup and was s...
Like someone mentioned, that 75-300 is basically a trap. Unfortunately, I have to disagree slightly about the 55-250 being the absolute best bet. I bo...
Like someone mentioned, you really need to be careful with the distortion on those budget zooms if you are aiming for high-quality prints. Since you a...
> Im in Chicago and really need to stay under 700 dollars for everything. Re: "Bookmarked, thanks!" - coming back to this with a reality check on t...
ive been shooting for years and honestly, once you find a reliable setup you just stick with it. My old setup for family dinners used to be a mess—eve...