I had issues with the nifty fifty in the park, it was way too zoomed for big views and not as good as expected for wildlife. Unfortunately, many budge...
In my experience, the adapter is why you're losing AF speed. Native glass just communicates better with the sensor. I once missed a rare wildlife shot...
Gonna try this over the weekend. Will report back if it works!
TL;DR: I’d *start* with the constant‑f/4 midrange zoom with extra reach… unless ur indoors a lot, then constant‑f/2.8 standard zoom might be worth it....
Seconding what was said earlier. I did a couple wet, sandy hikes with Panasonic Lumix S PRO 24-70mm f/2.8 + Panasonic Lumix S PRO 50mm f/1.4 and they ...
- A: Nikon NIKKOR Z 180-600mm f/5.6-6.3 VR (~$1,500–$1,800 used) best reach/value, AF is realy good on Z6 II. - B: Nikon NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 ...
Ok so for your situation, I’d say it’s worth it… but only if you’ll actually use the WR + tiny size a lot. - Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm f/2 R WR: relia...
- A: Nikon NIKKOR Z 180-600mm f/5.6-6.3 VR (~$1,500–$1,800 used) best reach/value, AF is realy good on Z6 II. - B: Nikon NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 ...
Ok so for your situation, I’d say it’s worth it… but only if you’ll actually use the WR + tiny size a lot. - Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm f/2 R WR: relia...
Ok so for your situation, I’d say it’s worth it… but only if you’ll actually use the WR + tiny size a lot. - Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm f/2 R WR: relia...
Hi there! Honestly, I've been in your shoes and I'd suggest the Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM prime. 1. It solves that tight 1.6x crop issue perfectly. 2....